Jump to content

Talk:Arunachal Pradesh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unsourced map

[edit]
Arunachal Pradesh as one of the lost territory in the Century of Humiliation

I have removed this supposed Chinese map from the main page because I couldn't find its source. If anybody knows, please discuss it here. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gaon bura

[edit]

One of the image captions says:"A Adi Gaonbura commonly found both in Arunachal Pradesh and China". It should be changed to say: "An Adi gaon bura (village head) commonly found both in Arunachal Pradesh and China". It is unclear whether "commonly found" is about the role (village head) or the tribe (Adi). 2001:1BA8:1482:1200:353B:51BC:CAE8:9450 (talk) 11:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, and used the image description. The previous description in the image was to set a certain narrative by sock puppet. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 April 2024

[edit]
NortheastStories (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss the Taniland Insurgency, under the insurgency section. I feel that it is important for the context of Arunachal.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the Emblem be and state symbols be removed?

[edit]

Gilgit Baltistan, Azad Kashmir, and Ladakh dont have state symbols or their emblem featured due to the territory being disputed and to make it less contriversial. With that logic, because a war happened between China and India in Arunachal pradesh, and is still disputed, the emblem and state symbol should be removed. Eehuiio (talk) 23:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis of Taiwanese government websites

[edit]

@157.15.55.219: Concerning your addition:

However, Taiwan has now excluded it from the scope of mainland China and treat it as part of India.[1][2]

Please read the Wikipedia policy on original research and synthesis. There are a few issues with this proposed content addition:

  1. Both references are to primary sources, which the Wikipedia policy on original research and synthesis says should not be analyzed, interpreted, or synthesized by editors. Secondary reliable sources are necessary for a statement about Arunachal Pradesh in relation to the laws and claims of the Republic of China, the Taiwan Area, mainland China, etc.
  2. The first reference does not mention Arunachal Pradesh, South Tibet, or India.
  3. The second reference does not mention Arunachal Pradesh or South Tibet. It's also a basic country info page and shouldn't be considered an authoritative reliable source on borders, territorial claims, nor anything else of a controversial nature.
  4. By Wikipedia policy on verifiability, such a statement must be accompanied by an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material where A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if the information is present explicitly in the source.

MarkH21talk 20:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Laws and Regulations Regarding Mainland Affairs". Mainland Affairs Council. Retrieved 30 May 2018. Article 3: The enforcement areas of Subparagraph 2 of Article 2 of the Act shall refer to areas under control of the Chinese Communists.
  2. ^ "印度共和國 Republic of India". Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). 中華民國外交部.